I just read an interesting piece from Forbes on designing AI to amplify human creativity rather than replace it.
The core argument was that the best AI tools act more like collaborators or assistants. They remove friction, surface patterns, and create space for people to think more deeply, not automate the thinking itself.
Personally, I can see this going two very different ways.
Some people will use AI to offload admin and repetitive work, freeing up mental space for creativity, judgement, and better decisions. Others will rely on AI to generate everything for them and never really build that creative muscle in the first place.
My hunch is the first group will get far more value long term. AI becomes a force multiplier, not a crutch.
Curious how others here think about this. Do you see AI genuinely amplifying creativity in practice, or are you worried it risks diminishing it over time?